DSM shares annual mycotoxin overview

The Covid-19 pandemic affected logistics and availability of feed materials, and this coupled with increased input and energy costs caused by the war in Ukraine meant significantly higher costs for producers. As a result, some farmers turned to cheaper products to manage their mycotoxin risk.

27,279 samples taken in World Mycotoxin Survey 2023

Areas with extreme risk category

Ms Mueller said mycotoxin prevalence and risk last year was categorised as extreme in China, South Asia and North America with samples showing a total risk of more than 75%. The risk level expresses the percentage of samples testing positive for at least one mycotoxin above the threshold level in parts per billion (ppb).

For example, the total risk level in the China/Taiwan was 97%. FUM 93%, DON 84% and ZEN 82% were the most common mycotoxins.

Risk above 50%

Samples from the Middle East and North Africa, Sub-Saharan and South Africa had total risk levels above the 50% threshold while levels were lower but still significant in Europe and Oceania.

European risk levels

DSM Animal Nutrition and Health mycotoxin risk managers Dr Wolfgang Markert and Sander Janssen, spoke of varying results across Europe from the nearly 9,000 samples taken. The European risk level of around 40% contained, for example some extremely high DON levels of 445,000ppb.

In all samples, DON was the most prevalent (46%), followed by ZEN (42%) and FUM (34%) although T-2 levels were significant at 34%. In corn, average levels of DON and ZEN were higher when compared to 2021 statistics.

…most concerning European statistics had come from Hungarian corn

Higher risk in southern & eastern Europe

In general, a higher percentage of mycotoxins was present in southern and eastern Europe. For example, in Italian finished feed FUM levels were very high 99%. The hot climate ensured that FUM grew easily. ZEN and DOM were also highly prevalent, and a 42% Aflatoxin level was found. Aflatoxins are transmittable from milk to humans.

Ukraine

FUM was also present in 80% of Turkish samples, with high levels of contamination. In Ukraine, a high volumes of ZEN contamination were present in wheat grains samples with levels of 48ppb. This is close to the risk for sensitive species, such as piglets and up to a maximum of 153ppb. Janssen and Markert said if farmers were to mix grains from Ukraine with finished feed, mycotoxin levels could be too high, so proper analysis and mitigation methods were necessary.

Hungary

Markert pointed out that some of the most concerning European statistics had come from Hungarian corn (kernels), where levels across all 6 mycotoxins were relatively high (76% DON, 72% FUM, 40% T2, 37% ZEN, 33% OTA and 30% Afla).

Netherlands

Turning to the Dutch results, the presenters said the Netherlands imported a lot of compound feed and the results showed 67% contamination with more than 1 mycotoxin and some high T-2 ppb figures which can be a specific risk to poultry.

Middle East and Africa

Further afield, Janssen said samples in the Middle East and North Africa showed FUM mycotoxins were highly abundant and the prevalence of ZEN, FUM and especially DON and T-2 had increased, which was concerning for poultry producers. 100% of corn kernel samples were contaminated with at least 2 mycotoxins.

In sub-Saharan Africa, DON (67%) is the main risk, while ZEN and Afla abundance increased, while there were nearly 800 samples taken from South Africa, showing that nearly 70% had more than 1 mycotoxin.

Advantages of rapid testing

Nora Kogelnik, Romer Labs product manager, talked about the main advantages of mycotoxin rapid tests, highlighting:

• Fast and Precise Results

• No laboratory experience needed

• Test and results can be carried out on-site

• Minimising/preventing disposal of organic solvents

However, while rapid testing is great for raw grains and nuts and grain by-products, Kogelnik admitted it was more limited for finished feed or silage samples. Finished feed is often a complex matrix with formulations which can vary widely.

For example, feed formulations can be split into 3:

• Protein meal – vegetable proteins, soybean, canola, animal proteins, meat, bone or fish

• Grains – wheat, corn, barley, sorghum or rye

• Vitamins, Minerals and Fats – fats and oils, vitamins, minerals, amino acids.

Multi-mycotoxin analysis

Mueller touch on multi-mycotoxin analysis and highlighted 3 which could cause issues for livestock producers:

1. Beauvericin and Enniatin: These have effects on immune systems and accumulate in fat-rich tissue. Enn B, B1+Beauvericin showed effect on microbiome of piglets and caused histological lesions in piglet’s liver.

2. Moniliformin: Broilers can be very susceptible as this mycotoxin can cause heart damage, muscular weakness, respiratory distress and immuno-suppression issues.

3. Alternariol: No acute toxicity; cytotoxic and mutagenic in vitro, effects on reproductive and immune system in vitro

She also spoke about some analysis carried out on peas, lupins, beans and chickpeas. Although sample levels (60) were low, the number of contaminations (FUM 28%) surprised her. They were the highest and the range of metabolites.

And she urged the sector to look at the 3 areas of solutions to reduce mycotoxins. These are adsorption (synergistic blend of minerals), biotransformation and bio protection products.